
| Review of Jill Kelly:
It would appear that I have made a mistake in one of my earlier reviews, I have mistakenly assumed that jillkellyproductions.com was the official Jill Kelly homepage on the web, now a semi-angry reader has informed me of jillkelly.com. I was not aware of this sites existence when I reviewed JKP and I wish I had known because this site is more for us Jill Kelly fans.
I found a lot of pictures of Jill, most pictures are not impressive in quality but as a fan you enjoy yourself looking over hardcore shoots and stuff of Jill behind the scenes. The pictures are not overwelming and I would have thought that after Jill having been around for so long, would have had more to offer in this section but it will have to do.
Where the site made a comeback was the nice movie clips collection. I looked over 20 different clips, some of Jill just showing off and some of her in hardcore action. The quality was ok for it's size and I got my Jill fix here.
I also stopped by to read her biography and found out that she started in the adult scene in the mid 90's and the fact that:"In 1999, Jill was awarded Best American Actress in an Adult Film at the Cannes Film Festival." quite impressive.
As standard for the people who has done webpages for Jenna Jameson and Briana Banks too, they have a diary written by ms. Kelly and I guess fans really do enjoy this. But even if this site is more for fans than JKP I can't help but feeling that something is missing, and it's like there is not enough updates to keep members happy for very long, but no doubt it's probably the biggest collection of Jill Kelly material on the net all in medium quality.
Price: 1 mont: $24.95
Conclusion:
I was still a bit disappointed with this site, I really was hoping for more, and I was hoping for a bit better quality of pictures. I did see a lot new material from Jill and I guess I would sign up for a month as a fan but after that I doubt I would ever come back, the updates are just too few and the fact that the last camera session was scheduled for 2 months ago doesn't speak well for this site.
2002-04-07

Go to site
Comments? Visit our Discussion Forum! | 
|